Book Stack
Resources >

Web-Log &
Press Releases

Sampling duration and recovery of culturable fungi

Published: May 3rd, 2008

Revised: July 21st, 2014

Saldanha R, Manno M, Saleh M, Ewaze JO, Scott JA. 2008. The influence of sampling duration on recovery of viable fungi using the Andersen N6 and RCS Biotest bioaerosol samplers. Indoor Air (epub ahead of print). doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2008.00547.x.

Abstract

The influence of sampling duration on recovery of culturable fungi was compared using the Andersen N6 and the Reuter Centrifugal Sampler (RCS). Samplers were operated side-by-side, collecting 15 samples each of incrementally increasing duration (1–15 min). From 270 samples collected, 26 fungal genera were recovered. Species of Alternaria, Aspergillus, Cladosporium, Epicoccum, Penicillium and Ulocladium were most frequent. Data adjusted to CFU/m³ were fitted to a Poisson regression model with a logarithmic link function and evaluated for the impact of sampling time on qualitative and quantitative recovery of fungi, both as individual taxa and in aggregate according to xerotolerance. Significant differences between the two samplers were observed for xerotolerant and normotolerant moulds, as well as Aspergillus spp. and Cladosporium spp. With the exception of Cladosporium spp., overall recoveries were higher with the RCS. When the Andersen N6 was used, the recovered levels of Cladosporium spp. and unidentified yeasts were reduced significantly at sampling times over 6 min. Similarly, when the RCS was used, recovery of Aspergillus spp., Penicillium spp., Ulocladium spp., unidentified yeasts, and low water activity fungi declined significantly at sampling times over 6 min.

Share Button